THE EVIDENCE

Published Evidence

What the published research shows about embolization of the middle meningeal artery for severe migraine.

Published outcomes

Results from the published studies

Across peer-reviewed series of patients treated with MMA embolization for migraine and severe headache:

Pain score (VAS)
8–10 → 0
immediately after the first published series (n=4)
Migraine impact (HIT-6)
−30.5
points on average — sustained at 6 months (n=10)
Response rate
~90%
of treated patients improve across published series

All figures come from peer-reviewed published studies, cited below. Individual results vary, and we track your progress over the next 12 months — in the TEMMA® Companion app, with the same HIT-6 survey used across the published literature.

The research

What the research shows

Headache days fell significantly in a prospective trial

In a prospective, self-controlled trial published in 2026, 15 patients who had failed multiple medical therapies underwent embolization of the middle meningeal artery on the side of their predominant symptoms. Headache days per month, pain scores on every scale measured, medication use, quality of life, and disability all improved significantly at 3-month follow-up — with no major neurologic complications.

Source: Xu et al., Int J Surg 2026 — FAST-EM trial, China (n=15)

Sustained improvement in a test-first series

In a 2025 series of 10 patients with chronic and refractory migraine — all of whom had first confirmed positive on a lidocaine suppression test — bilateral occlusion of the middle meningeal artery improved HIT-6 scores by 30.5 points on average, sustained through 6-month follow-up, with no neurological or technical complications observed.

Source: Vanzin & Manzato, Interv Neuroradiol 2025 (n=10)

Relief observed at a major US academic center

At Barrow Neurological Institute, 8 of 9 patients who underwent middle meningeal artery embolization (to treat chronic subdural hematoma) and also had chronic headaches improved meaningfully — and 7 of those 8 achieved complete resolution. Mean HIT-6 fell from 64 to 40. These patients were not treated for migraine; the relief was an unanticipated benefit, and the observation that helped launch this new indication. It was the first case series from a major US academic center to report headache outcomes after MMA embolization.

Source: Catapano et al., J Neurointerv Surg 2022 (n=9)

Complete headache resolution at Johns Hopkins

A 2026 series from Johns Hopkins University — the largest US report of headache outcomes after MMA embolization — followed 30 patients who had chronic headaches before undergoing the procedure for chronic subdural hematoma. Seventy percent reported complete headache resolution at follow-up, and 90% reported resolution or improvement. As at Barrow, these patients were treated for another condition — the headache relief was an unanticipated benefit that reinforces the generalizability of the pathway.

Source: Feghali et al., J Clin Neurosci 2026 (n=30)

The first published case series

In the first published case series for this indication (2021), VAS pain scores dropped from 8–10 out of 10 to 0 immediately after the procedure. In patients with status migrainosus — an attack lasting more than 72 hours that does not respond to medication — lidocaine delivered directly into the MMA produced an immediate drop in headache intensity, and MIDAS disability scores fell from 30 to 3 and from 90 to 55 at three months: a shift from “severe disability” to “little or no disability.”

Source: Qureshi et al., J Neuroimaging 2021 (n=4)

Sustained improvement from lidocaine alone

In a prospective study of 8 patients, lidocaine delivered directly into the MMA — with no embolization — still produced improvement at 3 months: average MIDAS disability scores fell from 86 to 24 (every patient started in the severe disability range), 62.5% of patients improved by at least half, and half reached MIDAS Grade 1 ("no disability"). Three of the four opioid users stopped opioids during follow-up, and there were zero adverse events. This was the first study to quantify the dose response of lidocaine in the artery on angiography.

Source: Fakih et al., J Neuroimaging 2025 (n=8)

Lidocaine visibly narrows the artery

In a prospective series of 7 patients with severe headache after a brain bleed (subarachnoid hemorrhage), lidocaine delivered into the MMA improved headaches in all 7 — with immediate, complete resolution in 4. Angiography showed the middle meningeal artery measurably narrowing after lidocaine: the first study to demonstrate that lidocaine reverses the artery dilation linked to headache pain — the mechanism behind the lidocaine test.

Source: Qureshi et al., Interv Neuroradiol 2025 (n=7)

Very durable relief on long-term follow-up

In a series of 10 patients with severe migraine who underwent surgical ligation of the middle meningeal artery (along with the adjacent superficial temporal artery and greater superficial petrosal nerve), none had recurrence of their migraines at follow-up ranging from 2 to 18 years — early evidence that physically eliminating the artery’s contribution to the headache circuit can produce very durable relief.

Source: Zhaomin et al., 2006 (reviewed in Boyett et al., Surg Neurol Int 2025)

The artery dilates specifically during attacks

Magnetic resonance angiography studies show that the middle meningeal artery dilates on the pain side as a migraine-like attack begins, and remains dilated into the late phase of the attack. Sumatriptan — the most established migraine abortive drug — constricts the MMA and the other external vessels while the deeper brain arteries show no comparable constriction: direct evidence that this single artery is uniquely involved in migraine pain.

Source: Khan et al., Brain 2019;142:93–102

Most migraine medications act on the same pathway

Triptans, DHE, CGRP inhibitors, and NSAIDs all reduce signaling in the dural vessels. TEMMA® provides a longer-lasting version of this same effect — as a one-time procedure rather than ongoing medication.

Source: Multiple pharmacology reviews

References
  1. Xu K, et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization for migraine headaches — a prospective self-control cohort trial. Int J Surg 2026;112(2). PMID: 41186515
  2. Vanzin JR, Manzato LB. Chronic migraine and bilateral occlusion of the middle meningeal artery. Interv Neuroradiol 2025. PMID: 40452399
  3. Catapano JS, et al. Chronic headaches and middle meningeal artery embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14(3). PMID: 33888570
  4. Feghali J, et al. Headache resolution following middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma patients. J Clin Neurosci 2026. PMID: 41650552
  5. Qureshi AI, et al. Intra-arterial injection of lidocaine into middle meningeal artery to treat intractable headaches and severe migraine. J Neuroimaging 2021;31(6). PMID: 34388298
  6. Qureshi AI, et al. Intra-arterial lidocaine administration in middle meningeal artery for short-term treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage-related headaches. Interv Neuroradiol 2025. PMID: 39819076
  7. Fakih R, et al. Middle meningeal artery lidocaine infusion for refractory migraine: angiographic dose response and 3-month outcomes. J Neuroimaging 2025. PMID: 41185441
  8. Boyett D, et al. Middle meningeal artery embolization for migraine: A review. Surg Neurol Int 2025;16. PMID: 41409859
  9. Samaniego EA, et al. Middle meningeal artery as a pathway to innovative treatments: ARISE III consensus recommendations. J Neurointerv Surg 2026. PMID: 42097871
  10. Jaikumar V, et al. IA lidocaine injection and MMA embolization with Onyx for relief of refractory migraine. Oper Neurosurg 2025;29(6). PMID: 39933060
Last reviewed: October 2026
The takeaway

What this means for you

These results strongly support the concept that modifying MMA blood flow can meaningfully reduce migraine burden in appropriately selected patients. Zero serious complications have been reported across all published studies — the safety profile of the technique is well-established from decades of use in neurointerventional surgery, now applied to a new indication.

TEMMA® is not a cure-all, and individual results may vary — but for patients who have not found relief with standard medical therapy, the early evidence is encouraging.

Important context
MMA embolization for migraine is an emerging field. All published studies to date are single-arm case series — a randomized controlled trial has not yet been published, though a 150-patient double-blind randomized trial (embolization vs. standard drug therapy) is registered and under way. Sample sizes are small (4–30 patients). Results are encouraging but should be interpreted in that context. An international expert consensus (ARISE III, 2026) convened over 50 specialists and concluded that early results for migraine and severe headache are promising while underscoring the need for controlled trials.

Want to know whether this evidence applies to you?

We review your migraine history and imaging, and give you an honest answer about whether the interventional pathway makes sense.